advertisement

Wigwam Trail Trax Pro Review

Friday, October 1st, 2010

Of all the gear in the world to review, nothing — nothing, I tell you — is more difficult than socks. I mean really, how much can you say about socks? I hear tales of gear glory all the time, like, “Thank goodness my backpack has an integrated bottle opener — all that beer would have gone to waste,” but I can’t think of a single time socks were the obvious hero. I suppose there was one time when I forgot to bring coffee-making paraphernalia on a two week trip and ended up with a designated coffee sock for filtering grounds, but really, cowboy coffee would have sufficed.

Of course the opposite is also true. It turns out that, if you have nothing much to say about socks, it means they work as advertised. That doesn’t mean I have literally nothing to say, though. Far from it. In fact, I have brought to bear my full scientific thinking powers to bring a sock-reviewing method to the madness.

Wigwam Trail Trax Pro Features

  • 49% Wool Dri-release, 35% Nylon, 14% Merino Wool, 2% Spandex
  • Cushiony sole
  • Foot hugging fit
  • FreshGuard eliminates odors
  • Seamless toe closure
  • Dri-release dries super fast

Wigwam Trail Trax Pro Review

The Trail Trax Pro may be made primarily with runners in mind, but I found it to be a terrific all-around outdoor sock.

Do I think about these socks when doing my thing?
Not even slightly, and that’s a great thing. I should be worried about river levels, marauding hillbillies and truck clearance, not my socks!

Are my feet uncomfortable in shoes that were previously comfortable?
The thought hasn’t even crossed my mind. The cushiony sole is more than adequate for my wimpy feet, and they wick moisture with aplomb. Add FreshGuard to the mix and wear them multiple days in a row without climbing partners noticing.

Did the socks’ qualities change after a few wash cycles?
I’m not sure, but my impression is that the Trail Trax Pro shrunk slightly over a couple wash cycles. This may have something to do with the wool content. If they did shrink, the difference is slight.

How long did the socks last under heavy use?
This is hard to answer, since it sort of depends on how many pairs of socks are in my rotation. For me, a non-backpacker-occasional-runner with something in the neighborhood of twelve pairs of socks I wear regularly, I had better damned well see at least a year out of my socks before the elastic weakens and I start to see my foot through them. Something in the neighborhood of two+ years is average. Three+ years is awesome. (If you only have five pairs of socks, adjust your perspective appropriately.)

Unfortunately, I haven’t had these socks long enough to say how well they held up over time. I’ll revisit this review every six months or so to update. Bookmark it now!

How do these socks look?
This is perhaps the least important attribute of a sock, but still, the Trail Trax Pro can have a little of that I’m-wearing-suit-socks-with-my-sneakers effect, if you’re not careful which color you buy. I have the taupe/brown heather version… <pregnant pause…> I have absolutely no idea what that means, but it’s a color combo I like. It looks outdoorsy.

Bottom Line:

The Wigwam Trail Trax Pro is fantastic compromise between light and feature rich. This is a terrific all-around outdoor sock.

Buy Now: Slip into a pair of Wigwam Trail Trax Pro socks.

Wigwam Ironman Flash Pro Review

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Of all the gear in the world to review, nothing — nothing, I tell you — is more difficult than socks. I mean really, how much can you say about socks? I hear tales of gear glory all the time, like, “If it weren’t for that tire patch kit, I’d be vulture food,” but I can’t think of a single time socks were the obvious hero. I suppose there was one time when I forgot to bring coffee-making paraphernalia on a two week trip and ended up with a designated coffee sock for filtering grounds, but really, cowboy coffee would have sufficed.

Of course the opposite is also true. It turns out that, if you have nothing much to say about socks, it means they work as advertised. That doesn’t mean I have literally nothing to say, though. Far from it. In fact, I have brought to bear my full scientific thinking powers to bring a sock-reviewing method to the madness.

Wigwam Ironman Flash Pro Features

  • 83% Stretch Nylon, 16% Acrylic, 1% Spandex
  • Heel tab prevents sock from slipping (Note: This is the weirdest feature. I’m not sure it actually does very much. I don’t think the socks would slip without it, but it does effect the looks of the Flash Pro — see below for more.)
  • Cushiony sole
  • Foot hugging fit
  • Breathable mesh instep
  • Seamless toe closure

Wigwam Ironman Flash Pro Review

The Ironman Flash Pro may be made primarily with runners in mind, but I found it to be a terrific all-around outdoor sock.

Do I think about these socks when doing my thing?
Not even slightly, and that’s a great thing. I should be worried about wet rock, copperheads and accidentally inhaling dried vulture poop, not my socks!

Are my feet uncomfortable in shoes that were previously comfortable?
The thought hasn’t even crossed my mind. The cushiony sole is more than adequate for my wimpy feet, and they wick moisture with aplomb.

Did the socks’ qualities change after a few wash cycles?
No change whatsoever! After roughly six washings, these socks look and feel the exact same as when they were brand new.

How long did the socks last under heavy use?
This is hard to answer, since it sort of depends on how many pairs of socks are in my rotation. For me, a non-backpacker-occasional-runner with something in the neighborhood of twelve pairs of socks I wear regularly, I had better damned well see at least a year out of my socks before the elastic weakens and I start to see my foot through them. Something in the neighborhood of two+ years is average. Three+ years is awesome. (If you only have five pairs of socks, adjust your perspective appropriately.)

Unfortunately, I haven’t had these socks long enough to say how well they held up over time. I’ll revisit this review every six months or so to update. Bookmark it now!

How do these socks look?
This is perhaps the least important attribute of a sock, but still… I have the orange/black version, which is flashy, but I definitely like it more than any of the other four available colors. The heel tab, which is there to prevent the sock from slipping, makes the sock look like a Peter-Pan bootie. That’s a strange thought, huh? I know, but it’s the first thing that crosses my mind when I pull them out of my sock drawer. However, once they’re on, I don’t even notice it, and have even come to like it.

Bottom Line:

The Wigwam Ironman Flash Pro is fantastic compromise between light and feature rich. It looks a little funny, but is rapidly becoming one of my all-time favorite socks.

Buy Now: Slip into a pair of Wigwam Ironman Flash Pro socks.

Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro Review

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

Of all the gear in the world to review, nothing — nothing, I tell you — is more difficult than socks. I mean really, how much can you say about socks? I hear tales of gear glory all the time, like, “That $10 snake bite kit saved my dog’s bacon after he tangled with that gila monster,” but I can’t think of a single time socks were the obvious hero. I suppose there was one time when I forgot to bring coffee-making paraphernalia on a two week trip and ended up with a designated coffee sock for filtering grounds, but really, cowboy coffee would have sufficed.

Of course the opposite is also true. It turns out that, if you have nothing much to say about socks, it means they work as advertised. That doesn’t mean I have literally nothing to say, though. Far from it. In fact, I have brought to bear my full scientific thinking powers to bring a sock-reviewing method to the madness.

Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro Features

  • 42% Stretch Nylon, 33% Dri-release, 21% Acrylic, 4% Spandex
  • Dri-release dries super fast
  • Lightweight sole
  • Foot hugging fit
  • FreshGuard eliminates odors
  • Breathable mesh air vents
  • Seamless toe closure

Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro Review

Made primarily with runners in mind, the Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro is feature-rich big brother of the Ironman Triathlete Pro.

Do I think about these socks when doing my thing?
Not even slightly, and that’s a great thing. I should be worried about my rickety elbows, my newly repaired lumbar spine and wether or not my dog is getting enough water, not my socks!

Are my feet uncomfortable in shoes that were previously comfortable?
The thought hasn’t even crossed my mind. Still, a little bit more cushioning wouldn’t hurt.

Did the socks’ qualities change after a few wash cycles?
No change whatsoever! After roughly six washings, these socks look and feel the exact same as when they were brand new.

How long did the socks last under heavy use?
This is hard to answer, since it sort of depends on how many pairs of socks are in my rotation. For me, a non-backpacker-occasional-runner with something in the neighborhood of twelve pairs of socks I wear regularly, I had better damned well see at least a year out of my socks before the elastic weakens and I start to see my foot through them. Something in the neighborhood of two+ years is average. Three+ years is awesome. (If you only have five pairs of socks, adjust your perspective appropriately.)

Unfortunately, I haven’t had these socks long enough to say how well they held up over time. I’ll revisit this review every six months or so to update. Bookmark it now!

How do these socks look?
This is perhaps the least important attribute of a sock, but still, my Wigwam Ironman Spark Pros are not too shabby in the looks department. I have the black version, which is a little bit geeky, but there’s some color in there, too, and a lot of gray to mitigate the I’m-wearing-suit-socks-with-my-sneakers effect. It comes in three other color styles, too, and a couple of them look nice and outdoorsy.

Bottom Line:

The Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro is fantastic compromise between light and feature rich. It wicks moisture like you’d expect from a sock with the word “Ironman” in its name, and has just enough cushion for trail pushin’.

Buy Now: Slip into a pair of Wigwam Ironman Spark Pro socks.

Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro Review

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Of all the gear in the world to review, nothing — nothing, I tell you — is more difficult than socks. I mean really, how much can you say about socks? I hear tales of gear glory all the time, like, “That little cam held my 40-foot air-bike ride with only two lobes engaged,” but I can’t think of a single time socks were the obvious hero. I suppose there was one time when I forgot to bring coffee-making paraphernalia on a two week trip and ended up with a designated coffee sock for filtering grounds, but really, cowboy coffee would have sufficed.

Of course the opposite is also true. It turns out that, if you have nothing much to say about socks, it means they work as advertised. That doesn’t mean I have literally nothing to say, though. Far from it. In fact, I have brought to bear my full scientific thinking powers to bring a sock-reviewing method to the madness.

Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro Features

  • 30% Olefin, 30% Acrylic, 20% Stretch Nylon, 15% Spandex
  • Lightweight design
  • Vitually seamless toe closure

Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro Review

Made primarily with runners in mind, the Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro is a light, stripped-down, no-frills sock.

Do I think about these socks when doing my thing?
I do actually think about them a little bit, and not just because I’m reviewing them. They have zero cushioning, and since I’m used to at least a little cushioning, I sort of notice it.

Are my feet uncomfortable in shoes that were previously comfortable?
A resounding “no.” Although as mentioned, I prefer more cushion in my socks. I may use these more as a base layer in cold weather, instead of a stand-alone sock for running or crag approaching.

Did the socks’ qualities change after a few wash cycles?
No change whatsoever! After roughly six washings, these socks look and feel the exact same as when they were brand new.

How long did the socks last under heavy use?
This is hard to answer, since it sort of depends on how many pairs of socks are in my rotation. For me, a non-backpacker-occasional-runner with something in the neighborhood of twelve pairs of socks I wear regularly, I had better damned well see at least a year out of my socks before the elastic weakens and I start to see my foot through them. Something in the neighborhood of two+ years is average. Three+ years is awesome. (If you only have five pairs of socks, adjust your perspective appropriately.)

Unfortunately, I haven’t had these socks long enough to say how well they held up over time. I’ll revisit this review every six months or so to update. Bookmark it now!

How do these socks look?
This is perhaps the least important attribute of a sock, but still, my Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pros are straight black, which doesn’t do much for a playa’s image, if you catch my drift. Who but a nerd or a suit wears black socks?! They also come in all white. You can’t see me, but I’m rolling my eyes right now.

Bottom Line:

The Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro is a no-frills basic performance sock. It wicks moisture like you’d expect from a sock with the word “Ironman” in its name, but it looks a little goofy in its plainness. Also, if you need cushion in your socks, check out a few other Wigwam models first.

Buy Now: Slip into a pair of Wigwam Ironman Triathlete Pro socks.

Wigwam Merino/Silk Scout Socks Review

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Of all the gear in the world to review, nothing — nothing, I tell you — is more difficult than socks. I mean really, how much can you say about socks? I hear tales of gear glory all the time, like, “It snowed so hard that yetis stayed indoors, but we were high and dry in that tent… for all 12 days of it,” however, I can’t think of a single time socks were the obvious hero. I suppose there was one time when I forgot to bring coffee-making paraphernalia on a two week trip and ended up with a designated coffee sock for filtering grounds, but really, cowboy coffee would have sufficed.

Of course the opposite is also true. It turns out that, if you have nothing much to say about socks, it means they work as advertised. That doesn’t mean I have literally nothing to say, though. Far from it. In fact, I have brought to bear my full scientific thinking powers to bring a sock-reviewing method to the madness.

Wigwam Merino/Silk Scout Features

  • 45% Coolmax, 25% Merino Wool, 22% Nylon, 6% Silk, 2% Spandex
  • Cushiony sole
  • Foot hugging fit
  • Breathable mesh air vents
  • Virtually seamless toe closure

Wigwam Merino/Silk Scout Review

Be still my beating dorsalis pedis pulse! The Merino/Silk Scout may be my favorite Wigwam sock of all time. If there’s a combo as dreamy Coolmax, Merino wool and silk, I haven’t yet touched it with my feet.

Do I think about these socks when doing my thing?
I actually do think about these socks a little bit, which means they either suck or they’re exceptional. In this case, I assure you it’s the latter.

Are my feet uncomfortable in shoes that were previously comfortable?
The thought hasn’t even crossed my mind. The cushiony sole is more than adequate for my wimpy feet, and they wick moisture with aplomb. Add FreshGuard to the mix and wear them multiple days in a row without your climbing partners noticing.

Did the socks’ qualities change after a few wash cycles?
I’m not sure, but my impression is that the Merino/Silk Scout shrunk slightly over a couple wash cycles. This may have something to do with the wool content. If they did shrink, the difference is slight.

How long did the socks last under heavy use?
This is hard to answer, since it sort of depends on how many pairs of socks are in my rotation. For me, a non-backpacker-occasional-runner with something in the neighborhood of twelve pairs of socks I wear regularly, I had better damned well see at least a year out of my socks before the elastic weakens and I start to see my foot through them. Something in the neighborhood of two+ years is average. Three+ years is awesome. (If you only have five pairs of socks, adjust your perspective appropriately.)

Unfortunately, I haven’t had these socks long enough to say how well they held up over time. I’ll revisit this review every six months or so to update. Bookmark it now!

How do these socks look?
This is perhaps the least important attribute of a sock, but still, the Merino/Silk Scout can have a little of that I’m-wearing-suit-socks-with-my-sneakers effect, if you’re not careful which color you buy. I have the charcoal version, which walks the line a little bit, but comes down, I think, in the non-nerdy category. Beware black.

Bottom Line:

The Wigwam Merino/Silk Scout is, in my opinion, the perfect combination of materials and features. With vents and foot hugging ribs in all the right places, a thick, cushiony sole and just a touch of silk — oh, baby — this is the sock for me.

Buy Now: Slip into a pair of Wigwam Merino/Silk Scout socks.

2010 Merrell ST Stamina 2 Running Shoes

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Merrell recently jumped into the traditional road running market and continues to offer a handful of road-specific shoes in the line. As a refinement from its introduction, the new ST Stamina 2 looks to clearly set the stage for Merrell’s acceptance into the market. The running shoe market is flush with offerings from all the major players, but Merrell’s core following should latch onto some of the nice fatures of this shoe, including: improved stability (G3 Phase Pronation), increased breathability, more comfortable fit with optimized uppers and ample cushioning in the forefoot and heel. Expect these in stores this Spring at a $105 pricepoint.

Buy Now: Search for Merrell Running Shoes

Fuel Belt Hydration Packs

Friday, August 8th, 2008

There have been a lot of attempts at providing better and better hydration options in recent years. But most of them have to do with refining the tried-and-true CamelBak style hydration pack. There’s a problem with this though, and that is that having a pack on your back in the middle of a race is suffocating. Sure, it’s probably fine for an early morning trail run. But in a race? Your back would be soaked before the first mile.

So if you want to stay hydrated during an endurance race, the only other option has been a fanny pack from MountainSmith or something that has slots for 2 bike-style water bottles. Those have their place, but in a competition you’ll be bouncing the hips on every step! And you’ll always be re-tightening the belt strap after every 10 steps.

Enter Fuel Belt — the real runner’s best option to stay hydrated during an endurance race. There are other similar approaches, such as the ones by Ultimate Direction and Amphipod, but the Fuel Belt is an excellent option for the serious runner.

First of all, the model of Fuel Belt I tried out is cut very trim —- no extra straps hanging off. It is made of high-durability elastic, reinforced with welded neoprene. This makes it a snug fit (which is good — because the less bounce the better). But beware — this means if you are usually a 32- or 33-inch waist jean like me, you’ll have a snug fit in the Medium. The Medium fits 30-33 pretty well, but not much larger than that. Go for the Large if you are 34-inches+.

Another thing that reduces flapping straps is the closure — which is simply a large & wide swath of VERY strong velcro. No snap buckle to pinch your middle over the top of a plastic buckle. The velcro is very comfortable, very secure, very lightweight and foolproof.

The model of Fuel Belt I used had two 8 oz. squirt bottles in the kidney area of the belt, and a single zip pouch (for either keys, blister kit, or a few envelopes of energy gel). This is a great setup, since the bottles don’t bounce on your frontside (there is a model with four 8 oz. bottles, including 2 in the front, for ultra-long endurance runs). Also, having a little spot for the keys saves you the swing-and-slap of having them in a front pocket of your shorts.

The design of the bottle itself is one of the key successes of the Fuel Belt, in my opinion. By flattening the dimensions of the bottle it makes it more ergonomic, and feels more like just part of your body — rather than an attachment. The other cool thing? I’ve found that those little 8 oz squeeze bottles are perfect for sliding into a laptop bag or even a ski jacket pocket. I love gear like this that can do double-duty for regular daily use, as well as performance utility for race or high-action situations. These little 8 oz. hydration bottles are great little flasks for energy drinks when you don’t want to wear a pack — though I wish there were a more secure closure for the nozzle for those kinds of uses.

As I ran with the Fuel Belt I really enjoyed having hydration right at hand without the sweat of a backpack or the bounce of a fanny pack. Ideal for a race. The only trouble I had was with replacing the bottles into the kidney area of the Fuel Belt. Since the elastic straps are quite secure around the bottle, it’s a little tough to fit the bottle back in while running at standard pace — I had to reduce my cadence a bit for a moment to get it slipped back in. Once or twice I had to reach back with both hands and use one hand to hold the elastics open while slipping the bottle back in with the other. However — whatever seconds you lose by lowering your cadence to replace the bottle will likely be regained tenfold by keeping yourself properly hydrated to keep attacking late into the race.

All told, the Fuel Belt is a great hydration option for runners. But that’s not all — Fuel Belt has also made some bottles and fuel gel boxes for cyclists and other pursuits as well (see my photos at right).

Check them out at FuelBelt.com.

BUY NOW: Click here to check out deals on other hydration packs.

Newton Running Shoes

Friday, August 1st, 2008

If you are a serious runner, you have definitely spotted Newton Running Shoes on some of your heroes. Heather Fuhr? Check. World Record holder Natascha Badman? Check. Ironman champions like Michellie Jones and Peter Reid? Yep, they are in them too.

So what is it about this shoe that has the athletes buzzing? Newton Running Shoes haven’t just come up with new springs and bouncy shock absorbers. They actually change the way your foot takes its step, making you less likely to incur injury. And even if you aren’t competitive, if you are just running to stay fit, staying injury-free is the best way to always be ready to exercise. I should know — I’m currently injured and I’m sitting here writing to you instead of getting out there being active. Nothing can turn tone into tubbiness like an injury that keeps you sedentary.

Did you know that a surprising percentage of runners will have to discontinue running this year because of running-related injuries? The guys at Newton Running Shoes know that —- I guarantee it. And some folks think their shoes could be a serious runner’s ticket to reducing running-related injury. Here is how Newton says their shoes are different:

When you run barefoot you naturally land on your forefoot. Newton Running shoes were developed to make your feet think they’re barefoot and increase your performance.

The sole of Newton mimics your own, allowing your foot to move freely and promote a forefoot impact.

Basically, when you run in regular shoes all of your weight lands squarely on the heel….pounding on it over and over. That’s a ton of impact, over and over. That’s a lot of punishment, over and over. Newton Running Shoes are supposed to have your forefoot hit first, which many say causes more than 50% rebound of energy.

So it’s no secret why many folks are checking them out:
1) Since you land on the forefoot, there’s may not be a need for big shock absorption under the heel;
2) Which means the shoe can be made lighter;
3) Which means you will likely conserve energy;
4) Which means you might feel like you can run more without as much risk of injury.

Check them out here: NewtonRunning.com

BUY NOW: Click here to see great deals on other running shoes, too.

Nike Air Structure Triax Trail Running Shoe

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

I’ve been running my old shoes way past their breaking point. They were Adidas, so they didn’t have air — which to me has always been a downfall. I like the everyday wearability of pure EVA or foam-like midsole shoes, like Adidas makes (oh sure — they may call it Adiprene or something special, but it’s really just tricked-out foam or a variation on EVA). However — the problem with EVA or foam-ish midsole shoes is that they lose their absorption much more quickly than any other kind of midsole. EVA not so much as some cheaper foam-ish materials, but still much more quickly than an air bladder. So I’ve decided that I only really want to do foam/EVA midsoles if they also have an air bladder in them. Or, I could do an EVA-only midsole if I’m in a racing shoe that I want to be super-light for just a few uses until it is tossed.

You may say, what’s lighter than air? Well, foam or EVA is because with air you have to have a heavy plastic bladder to contain the air. Okay, then why is it that you want Nike air instead of an EVA or foam-only midsole? Because have you ever been running in an Adidas shoe for a few times & then noticed all the compression wrinkles in the midsole? That’s because all the air bubbles in the foam-like material are being popped — so pretty soon the midsole is all wrinkled and it loses all its absorption. Then your joints are just pounding the ground.

I learned this the hard way. In college I ran on non-air shoes for a while and ended up with a misalignment of the patella (kneecap). It was very painful, and when I went to the orthopedist (also a runner) he asked how much I ran. I said about 50 miles per week. Then he pointed to my shoes and said, “Not in those wrinkly things I hope?!” I confirmed, and he told me there are three main things you have to balance when deciding on picking up some good running shoes for everyday use:

1) Not having air under your heel will allow your heel to drop down into the midsole a bit and give it more of a stable cup to sit in, however..

2) That comes at a cost of more wear and tear on your joints — so he recommended sacrificing some heel cup stability to have enduring cushioning (as long as it doesn’t pop, an air bladder has just as much cushion 30 days later as when it was purchased — whereas a foam- or EVA-style midsole will have lost a ton of absorption through wrinkling).

3) The third consideration is fit — and though Adidas seem to have a wider forefoot which I like, it’s not worth risking joint injury.

Nike running shoes seem to come a bit narrower than other running shoes, and as such I usually have to purchase them a half-size larger than my skate shoes or other brands of running shoes. With some dress shoes and casual shoes I go with a 9.5 for a snug fit, but I can’t do that in Nike. In Nike shoes I almost always get a 10 and it fits just as closely to the foot as a 9.5 in other shoes. It’s also slightly narrower than something like an Adidas running shoe.

For durability, I suppose the best combination would be a polyurethane midsole with an air bladder. But I have seen some old Nike’s with polyurethane midsoles and they are way too heavy in my opinion. So I think the best is a combination foam or EVA midsole with an air bladder under at least the heel (if not the ball of the foot too).

And that’s the combination that the Nike Air Structure Triax has. There are also two key features of the Air Structure that I really would like to point out:

1) It has very sturdy support (harder material) under the inside portion of the heel — so it’s great for most runners, including those who tend to pronate. But beware if you supinate — these things will pitch you out onto the outside of your heel even more.

2) Since it is not a pure road running shoe, but rather is a trail running shoe, the Nike Air Structure Triax comes with a Gore-Tex liner — which is heavier and much less breathable than the lightweight mesh-style uppers of road running shoes such as the Nike Air Pegasus. This is great in wet or cold situations — such as you often find when trail running. And it is also a more durable upper than more ventilated road running shoes. But I wish it came with a fabric such as eVent which is still waterproof but has much better breathability than Gore-Tex.

I noticed the ventilation of the Nike Air Structure Triax to be in stark contrast to the exceptional breathability of the Vasque Aether Tech Softshell trail running shoe. Also, I preferred the BOA-style lacing of the Vasque shoe to the traditional laces of the Air Structure. But I really liked the waffle-style sole of the Air Structure, which has good grip but wide channels to clear the mud readily.

All in all, the shoe is a great option for trail running if your foot can fit a Nike. If you are a particularly wide foot, you may want to look elsewhere. And because of the limited breathability, I wouldn’t recommend this shoe as your summer road running shoe by any stretch. This is better as an Autumn or early-Spring trail runner.

BUY NOW: Click here for the women’s Nike Air Structure Triax 11.

BUY NOW: Click here to check out lots of other deals on some of the best running shoes on GEAR.com.

BUY NOW: Click here to see tons of clearance deals on athletic shoes at Overstock.com.